Jesus, the time traveller

Reflections on Ascension Day, 13th of May 2010.
So maybe I've watched a little bit too much Dr. Who lately, but bear with me here.
An enduring question in Christian theology is: Where is Jesus? Or, more specifically, when he ascended, where did he go? After finding out some centuries ago that we don't live in a three-tiered universe, with God and heaven physically above us and the devil and hell below us, it seems the ascension has become somewhat unintelligible.
The doctrine of accommodation does go some way to explain what's going on: Jesus existed in the first century and took upon himself or worked within that intellectual framework. So when he ascended, he did so to make a point that assumed an ancient cosmology, just as when he appeared to exorcise demons in healing illness (when he actually took care of germs and DNA, etc.) or when he spoke of Adam and Eve and Noah, for example, as if they were historical figures (which he, as God, presumably knew they weren't).
But still the question remains: What happened to Jesus after the ascension?
The modern liberal symbolic understanding of the resurrection appearances does away with the problem, I guess. Jesus wasn't there in the body, even though the disciples might have thought so (though, they might not have). So his rising from the grave and his ascension (and everything in between) were visions, induced by the spiritual presence of Jesus himself. As an Evangelical I'm inclined to reject this understanding and go traditional: Jesus was bodily resurrected.
Traditionally, God is said to reside outside space and time. If Jesus is an actual, embodied, flesh and blood human it's difficult to see how he can exist outside space and time. Granted, the post-resurrection accounts seem to suggest that his body, his glorified body, didn't quite abide by the laws of physics - when he walking through a locked door, for example. So it could be thought that Jesus also could transcend physical laws completely and, after, I guess, having passed the clouds and being out of view, stepped out of the universe. Could be thought.
I have another idea though: When Jesus ascended, he didn't fall out of the universe. When he ascended, he bent the universe and travelled through time.
Only days before the crucifixion Jesus spoke of his Father's house and said, "I am going there to prepare a place for you." (John 14:2) Maybe this isn't a metaphor. Maybe "there" also means "then", and Jesus is literally there and then, waiting for us to catch up with him and his Father's prepared house. Revelation 21 speaks of the New Jerusalem "coming down out of Heaven from God". It's not hard to see how that image might apply for the future, rushing towards us from God.
Because God is the God of the future. As Pannenberg says, he is "the Lord of the future, toward whose coming the world is moving."1 Pannenberg does qualifies that statement by saying that "God is not among the beings existing in the world", yes, but incarnationally, it makes sense to say that Jesus embodies that divine existence. What's important is that Christian theology says that the world is oriented towards the future, that we exist eschatologically. And in that sense, the time travelling Jesus makes a fair amount of sense.
Theoretically, time travel is possible. Or at least, that's what Stephen Hawking says. And if time travel is possible, then God, in Jesus, is able to do it. And maybe, just maybe, he actually has.
- Pannenberg, "The Question of God", Basic Questions in Theology 2, 233 ↩
Fighting the Anti Christ in Virginia
Washington Post reports,
RICHMOND, FEB. 9 -- The House of Delegates is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a bill that would protect Virginians from attempts by employers or insurance companies to implant microchips in their bodies against their will.
It might also save humanity from the antichrist, some supporters think.
Del. Mark L. Cole (R-Fredericksburg), the bill's sponsor, said that privacy issues are the chief concern behind his attempt to criminalize the involuntary implantation of microchips. But he also said he shared concerns that the devices could someday be used as the "mark of the beast" described in the Book of Revelation.
"My understanding -- I'm not a theologian -- but there's a prophecy in the Bible that says you'll have to receive a mark, or you can neither buy nor sell things in end times," Cole said. "Some people think these computer chips might be that mark."
Ok, let me get this straight.
There are people in Virginia who are afraid of microchip technology because they think it's the mark of the beast. That is, they think it will be part of the system of monetary enslavement of an world dictator individual who will basically be Satan in disguise. This figure is not here yet, but will take over the world right after the rapture of all Christians has happened. These events are part of the prophetic scenario of what can be called Left Behind-eschatology, a belief way too popular in this fragile world of Israel and Palestine, Islamic extremism and the West's war on terror.
Seeing the microchip as part of this scenario, these Virginians are fighting. But I have some questions.
Isn't fighting the microchip going against God's eschatological plan, laid down before the foundation of the earth? I assume that these events are somehow contingent on one another, part of a series of events that have "come to pass", one after another. So, if Virginians manage to legally stop the implementation of the microchip, the mark of the beast, can't it be thought that they might prevent Jesus from returning and thus the whole series of eschatological events - tribulation, Armageddon, death of most Jews, all that - of ever coming to pass.
So the Virginians are preventing God's eschatological plan from ever happening because by fighting this microchip. But if they're undermining God's plan by fighting it, why even believe in it in the first place? Why be afraid of the microchip at all?
Dear Virginians, you make no sense!
Eschatological dance music
I went to Glasgow on Tuesday to see David Bazan. Amazing show. Post coming.
While on the bus on my way there, I listened to Danish DJ Trentemøller. While listening to "Rykketid" this thought occurred to me.
The narrative directionality of dance music makes it the perfect vessel for the retelling of the eschatological story of the Gospel.
The drama. The dynamics. The build-up. The ultimately satisfied anticipation. The Gospel.
Listen to it. You can feel it.
Moltmann on believing

To believe means to cross in hope and anticipation the bounds that have been penetrated by the raising of the crucified. If we bear that in mind, then this faith can have nothing to do with fleeing the world, with resignation and with escapism. In this hope the soul does not soar above our vale of tears to some imagined heavenly bliss, nor does it sever itself from the earth. For, in the words of Ludwig Feuerbach, it puts ‘in place of the beyond that lies above our grave in heaven the beyond that lies above our grave on earth, the historicfuture, the future of mankind’. It sees in the resurrection of Christ not the eternity of heaven, but the future of the very earth on which his cross stands. It sees in him the future of the very humanity for which he died. That is why it finds the cross the hope of the earth. This hope struggles for the obedience of the body, because it awaits the quickening of the body. It espouses in all meekness the cause of the devastated earth and of harassed humanity, because it is promised possession of the earth. Ave crux – unica spes!
But on the other hand, all this must inevitably mean that the man who thus hopes will never be able to reconcile himself with the laws and constraints of this earth, neither with the inevitability of death nor with the evil that constantly bears further evil. The raising of Christ is not merely a consolation to him in a life that is full of distress and doomed to die, but it is also God’s contradiction of suffering and death, of humiliation and offence, and of the wickedness of evil. Hope finds in Christ not only a consolation in suffering, but also the protest of the divine promise against suffering. If Paul calls death the ‘last enemy’ (I Cor. 15.26), then the opposite is also true: that the risen Christ, and with him the resurrection hope, must be declared to be the enemy of death and of a world that puts up with death. Faith takes up this contradiction and thus becomes itself a contradiction to the world of death. That is why faith, wherever it develops into hope, causes not rest but unrest, not patience but impatience. It does not calm the unquiet heart, but is itself this unquiet heart in man. Those who hope in Christ can no longer put up with reality as it is, but begin to suffer under it, to contradict it. Peace with God means conflict with the world, for the goad of the promised future stabs inexorably into the flesh of every unfulfilled present. If we had before our eyes only what we see, then we should cheerfully or reluctantly reconcile ourselves with things as they happen to be. That we do not reconcile ourselves, that there is no pleasant harmony between us and reality, is due to our unquenchable hope. This hope keeps man unreconciled, until the great day of the fulfilment of all the promises of God. It keeps him in statu viatoris, in that unresolved openness to world questions which has its origin in the promise of God in the resurrection of Christ and can therefore be resolved only when the same God fulfils his promise. This hope makes the Christian Church a constant disturbance in human society, seeking as the latter does to stabilize itself into a ‘continuing city’. It makes the Church the source of continual new impulses towards the realization of righteousness, freedom and humanity here in the light of the promised future that is to come. This Church is committed to ‘answer for the hope’ that is in it (I Peter 3.15). It is called in question ‘on account of the hope and resurrection of the dead’ (Acts 23.6). Wherever that happens, Christianity embraces its true nature and becomes a witness of the future of Christ’.
– Jürgen Moltmann, Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology (New York/Evanston: Harper & Row, 1967), 20–22.
HT: Per Crucem Ad Lucem
Photo: Response




