I Think I Believe I am Jesus' little brain cell

16Aug/101

This reviewer is truly plugged in

It's a truly constructive premise: If something goes against your beliefs, stay away from it, call it anti-Christ and feel sad about the people who watch it. Of course, the redemptive violence of Karate Kid is recommended. (Not that I mind the film, because it goes against my beliefs - I just hate Jackie Chan.)

30Dec/090

“Waiting for Armageddon” trailer

I love religious documentaries. One of my new years resolutions is to write more reviews, specifically of films, including religious documentaries. Coming up in January are Channel 4's Tsunami: Where Was God?, Frisbee: The Life and Death of a Hippie Prophet and Hell House. I plan to make the above Waiting for Armageddon one of them. It will be released theatrically next week in New York. Have no idea when it will be released on DVD. Hopefully next year sometime. What I'm not so hopeful about is the film itself. Initially, it looks a bit sensationalistic and scaremongering. Yes, Zionism is dangerous, especially when coupled with rapture eschatology and the Iran angle is not exactly settling, but the tone of the narrative doesn't seem very promising. It reminds me of Jesus Camp, a film that mirrored the angst it criticised perfectly, only reversed: The crazy Evangelicals were scared of crazy liberals taking over the country, while the crazy liberals were scared of crazy Evangelicals taking over the country. And both accused the other of abusing children. Outrage, but not much more. Will Waiting for Armageddon be better? We'll see.

22Oct/091

The first 13 minutes of “Collision”

Collision looks like an absolutely great film! Set to be released on DVD in a couple of days, it chronicles a set of public appearances by grumpy atheist Christopher Hitchens and rather more cheery Christian apologist Douglas Wilson to promote their book, Is Christianity Good for the World? As you can see, the production value is top notch and, although it's hard to judge from such a relatively short clip, the film promises to deliver a narrative that's both intellectually engaging and personable. I'm especially looking forward to seeing more of Hitchens the person. He has always intrigued me. Although there are a lot of reasons not to like him, behind the rhetoric he has a strange sort of charm and attraction about him. So it'll be nice to get to know him a bit.

14Oct/090

Semi-daily tidbits 14/10/2009

6a00d83451da9669e20120a63aa726970c-400wiCrucified Ape Unveiled in London (Times Online)
More edgy - more likely to offend, at any rate - is The Privilege of Dominion, in which a waxwork ape appears nailed to a cross. "At the rate we're killing them all the lowland gorillas will be dead by the year 2020," says Fryer. "Do animals have souls? What a question. We should be asking the same question of ourselves."

The Assclown Offensive: How to Enrage the Church of Scientology (Wired)
"Hello, leaders of Scientology. We are Anonymous," the clip began in a robotic, software-generated voice-over accompanied by stock footage of clouds rolling over desolate cityscapes. "Your campaigns of misinformation, your suppression of dissent, your litigious nature: All of these things have caught our eye," the voice explained. "For the good of your followers, for the good of mankind—and for our own enjoyment—we shall proceed to expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the Church of Scientology in its present form." The message ended, as it had begun, on a pitch-perfect note of sci-fi comic book menace: "We are Legion," the robot voice intoned. "We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us."

The ecocidal moment (Guardian.co.uk)
Rowan Williams: "How do we live in a way that honours rather than endangers the life of our planet? Or, to put it slightly differently, how do we live in a way that shows an understanding that we genuinely live in a shared world, not one that simply belongs to us? This would be a good question even if we were not faced with the threats associated with global warming, with the reduction of biodiversity, with desertification and deforestation, with fuel and food shortages."

God in the Box
Synopsis: God in the Box is a documentary film, which explores the mystery and controversy behind what God looks like and means to us as Americans in the 21st century. In the midst of today's fractured and confusing claims on God, the film asserts two basic questions: What does God mean to you? What does God look like, to you?
The filmmakers embark on a cross-cuntry journey with their small, mobile studio (and main character), The Box. they invite people to step inside and share what they see in the mind's eye, and if possible, draw what God looks like to them. Along their journey, the filmmakers set The Box up on iconic street corners and diverse locations across America.
A remarkable collection of scholars, archeologists and religious leaders help examine the material and put it into a historical and relevant context. The surprises and revelations about our current interpretations of God come to light, as small glimpses inside the minds of others helps illuminate a much bigger picture.

Abortion Foes Tell of Their Journeys to the Streets (NY Times)
Together, these street activists make up an assertive minority of a few thousand people within the larger anti-abortion movement. Neither the best financed nor largest element in the mix, they are nonetheless the only face of anti-abortion that many Americans see. Indeed, persistent provocation is their defining attribute: day after day on street corners from California to Massachusetts, they stand like town criers, calling to women walking into abortion clinics, or waving graphic signs as disturbing as they are impossible to ignore.

Believing in God and Evolution (Inside Higher Ed)
[T]here is ... a theological and scientific struggle taking place at Christian colleges. Some professors, with support from prominent scientists, are trying to defend the teaching of evolution and to make it safe for those who teach biology and the Bible to talk about ways in which belief in evolution need not represent an abandonment of faith. Many Christian colleges have statements of faith -- which in some cases must be followed by all students and faculty members -- that endorse the literal truth of the Bible or of specific parts of the Bible (six literal days of creation, for example, or that Adam and Eve are the parents of all humans). So teaching evolution as scientific fact, which would just be taken for granted at many non-Christian colleges and universities, raises all kinds of delicate issues.

The Salvation Army has toppled Google to become the most trusted brand in Australia

One Baptist Church To Celebrate Halloween By Burning Bibles

Quote of the day

Yo, God, this creation thing is great, and Imma let you finish, but I just wanted to say that Phil Collins had the best Genesis of all time.

29Sep/090

Told you so!

So it appears that Creation, the Darwin biopic, just got a distributor in the States. Somewhat ironically, it's independent company Newmarket who also distributed The Passion of the Christ. I guess the film wasn't too controversial anyway - or maybe that's exactly what it was. Everyone knows that controversy sells tickets.

Does this reflect badly on the film? The reviews have been mostly positive, but not exuberantly so. It's a quiet film. Maybe there's some truth in the rather infantile comments from Uncommon Descent, a leading intelligent design blog.

Most likely, the film – which led off the Toronto International Film Festival – was rejected because it is a bore. No one here cares about Charles and Emma Darwin.

Maybe it is a little unexciting compared to, say, Die Hard 4. And maybe the producers feel that they need to drum up some controversy to fill seats in the cinema. Haven't seen the film yet, but I really don't think it's necessary. It'll never be a blockbuster, but in addition to being by all accounts a decent grown up drama, it has some built in controversy simply because of the fact that it's about Darwin. It'll do good and a little bit more, but that's it.

14Sep/090

“Creation”, ctd.

Creation, the new Darwin biopic, might be put to death by creationism. The makers can't find a distributor in the US. The Telegraph says,

However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive in a country where, according to a Gallup poll conducted in February, only 39 per cent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.

Movieguide.org, an influential site which reviews films from a Christian perspective, described Darwin as the father of eugenics and denounced him as "a racist, a bigot and an 1800s naturalist whose legacy is mass murder". His "half-baked theory" directly influenced Adolf Hitler and led to "atrocities, crimes against humanity, cloning and genetic engineering", the site stated.

The film has sparked fierce debate on US Christian websites, with a typical comment dismissing evolution as "a silly theory with a serious lack of evidence to support it despite over a century of trying".

Jeremy Thomas, the Oscar-winning producer of Creation, said he was astonished that such attitudes exist 150 years after On The Origin of Species was published.

"That's what we're up against. In 2009. It's amazing," he said.

"The film has no distributor in America. It has got a deal everywhere else in the world but in the US, and it's because of what the film is about. People have been saying this is the best film they've seen all year, yet nobody in the US has picked it up.

"It is unbelievable to us that this is still a really hot potato in America. There's still a great belief that He made the world in six days. It's quite difficult for we in the UK to imagine religion in America. We live in a country which is no longer so religious. But in the US, outside of New York and LA, religion rules.

"Charles Darwin is, I suppose, the hero of the film. But we tried to make the film in a very even-handed way. Darwin wasn't saying 'kill all religion', he never said such a thing, but he is a totem for people."

It's sad that creationists thrive on misinformation, with their false - vile, really - assessment of Darwin and the legacy of his theory, and suppression of information, with no one wanting to distribute Creation.

Edit 18/09/2009
This is my prediction: While the film hasn't found a distributor yet, there are already rumours of an ensuing bidding war. I'm pretty convinced that the article above is a slightly clever attempt to drum up some hype for the film, first of all in the blogosphere and then the media in general. It's like when films are banned or when the Catholic church says it disapproves: Everyone wants to see the film.  Wait and see. Creation will announce an American distributor in a couple of days. Or maybe weeks. But it will happen.

12Sep/090

Shy “Creation”, apparently

7430_124957669860_39212784860_2252969_3266259_n

Creation, the new Darwin biopic, was just premiered a couple of days ago at the Toronto Film Festival and will begin screening, in the UK at least, the 25th of September. I've been looking forward to it for a while. It looks pretty good. And I'm always interested in films that explore the interface between science and faith.

But according to initial comments by Roger Ebert, the film shies away from really going into the depths of the conflict between science and faith, as personified by Darwin and his wife respectively. The films both intellectual and dramatic depth and impact consequently suffers.

The movie devotes most of its attention to the marriage, as Emma (Jennifer Connelly) rebukes Charles (Paul Bettany) for his heretical convictions and thinks they mean the two of them cannot spend eternity together. They're both intelligent and deeply in love, and it's a shame the movie doesn't allow them to fully debate their differences. It sees their opinions instead somewhat vaguely as personality characteristics. Did it occur to Darwin or his wife that nothing in his ideas precluded the existence of God? Today, no major religion finds conflict between God and the theory of evolution. The majority of Christians can live with both ideas; religious opposition to Darwin is limited primarily to a fundamentalist minority of American Christians.

I ask myself, do we really need to watch the Darwins edging around the substance of their disagreement? The film maker, Jon Amiel, obviously has great respect and affection for the scientist--for them both, really. Did he restrain himself in fear of provoking controversy? Has it gotten to that point? "Creation" dares not state relevant ideas that were acceptable nearly 50 years ago, when "Inherit the Wind" was nominated for four Academy Awards. There's no such shyness in the anti-Darwin faction.

19Aug/090

Now I *really* want to see “Dead Snow”

I love horror films. Particularly, I love ridiculous splatter films a la Sam Raimi (absolutely loved Drag Me To Hell!) and the like. I also love and try to keep up with Nordic films, since I'm Nordic myself and all that (Let The Right One In is an excellent example of Nordic horror, should you be interested - so incredibly good!).

So you can imagine my excitement when I first heard about Dead Snow, a Norwegian zombie horror-comedy, complete with Nazis and everything! It's directed by Tommy Wirkola, of whom I've heard good things. I was going to watch, no matter what - especially since it features Benea Reach, one of my favourite Nordic metal bands in the trailer.

Then I read this, a review of the film from Journal of Religion and Film. And, to keep it short, now I'm even more excited.

If the provocation of disgust is central in horror, so, too, is its catharsis. The zombie genre nearly always requires that the protagonists free themselves from their disgust for blood and take almost delirious pleasure in killing zombies. Two surviving students in Dead Snow take up chainsaw and axe to battle Colonel Herzog and his followers. The lust for killing that they are now free to enjoy marks the final transformation of these timid, over-civilized medical students into confident, but brutal, men. The violation of a symbolic order, the erasure of differences both social and moral, and the descent into contagious violence mirrors what René Girard has called the sacrificial crisis. According to Girard it was in the midst of such a sacrificial crisis that religious ritual was born out of the sacrifice of a scapegoat. It is tempting to view the zombie film as a disguised re-enactment of such a crisis, except in the context of a society which has replaced rituals of purity with law courts and technology. The apocalyptic degeneration of society into murderous competition, relived time and again in zombie films, only underlines the precariousness of that replacement. Zombie films like Dead Snowallow the continued re-living and repetition of that unresolved problem of violence that once had an imperfect safety valve in religious ritual.

Tagged as: , , No Comments