John Piper taking a break to have more, erm, marital relations?
I can't have been the only one to think this.
Yesterday, Christianity Today reported that John Piper, conservative pastor-theologian extraordinaire and glory of God fan, is taking an 8 month leave from ministry. I'm not really a fan of Piper's, upper middle class white emergent-type that I am (though I really liked his prosperity gospel rant), but as far as I can tell he is a man of integrity. And this break seems like a good idea. Pastors overwork themselves all the time. And that causes all sorts of problem. Instead of some scandal befalling him in a year or two, Piper seems to have the adequate self-knowledge to anticipate a dangerous situation. Very good. Very, very good.
But one of the quotes in the article stood out. Discussing his commitment to his wife, Piper is quoted as saying,
"The precious garden of my home needs tending," he told his congregation.
I might be mistaken, but isn't this a reference to Song of Solomon? Song of Solomon 4, specifically?
In this chapter, notorious among Evangelical teens for that boob reference, you have the male protagonist (is that the right designation? It's late, I don't know...) describing, in verse 12, the premarital - how to put this delicately? - nether regions of his love interest.
You are a garden locked up, my sister, my bride;
you are a spring enclosed, a sealed fountain.
In verse 15, he continues,
You are a garden fountain,
a well of flowing water
streaming down from Lebanon.
The next verse, the final verse in the chapter, is post-marital and addressed to the lover, aforementioned male protagonist, from the bride.
Awake, north wind,
and come, south wind!
Blow on my garden,
that its fragrance may spread abroad.
Let my lover come into his garden
and taste its choice fruits.
Pretty hot stuff!
So, when Piper refers to the "precious garden" of his home, am I the only one picking up some sexual innuendo? A Biblical double entendre? Not faulting Piper here, of course. I'm all for tending the proverbial garden. All for getting my fingers green, so to speak. I see this, the whole taking a break, as a very good and constructive move on Piper's part. And I hope he and his wife have a good time.
Piper and abortion
A couple of questions, Mr. Piper. Do you really think making abortion illegal will solve anything? Focusing on the legal dimension, on Roe v. Wade, is completely wrong. Making abortion illegal will only export it for the rich and drive it underground for, and thus harming, the poor. And while I'm sure, Mr. Piper, that you are correct about Obama's hopes for his daughters, what exactly are you proposing? That he magically turn all citizens into chaste puritanical Christians? That he make pre-marital sex illegal? What you say is exactly what's wrong with so much of the pro-life movement: Too much rhetoric and too little reality. Instead of being distracted by laws and paragraphs, why not actually help those women and families whose circumstances force them into situations where abortion becomes an option?
What about global warming, John Piper?

A couple of months ago, John Piper created a bit of a furore among us liberal types when he said that a freak hurricane in Minneapolis was a sign of God's disapproval for the ELCA's inclusion of gays. Lots of other people have said many wise things about the problems with what Piper said, so I won't comment.
I just have a question.
Right now, large parts of the northern hemisphere are experiencing what the press here in Britain creatively dubbed "the big freeze". Above is a picture of my town, Aberdeen, covered in snow. Though the timing of the snow, ice and general cold was pretty good - in time for Christmas and, more importantly, Christmas vacation, so it made less damage than it could have -, it has hampered daily life for millions over the last couple of weeks.
It's getting a bit annoying this weather, especially now that the snow is melting and there's only ice and lots of water left, but it's just weather. Sometimes weather's good, sometimes it's bad. But not to all, apparently. In an article I read tonight, a certain Elmer Beauregard, of Minnesotans for Global Warming, read more into the weather than most of us.
"We prayed for snow at Copenhagen and God answered us big time and He doesn't seem to be letting up. It seems like He is reminding us who actually is in control of the weather."
Elmer Beauregard is what is affectionately known as a global warming denier. It's not clear to me if he denies global warming because he wants to retain the idea of God controlling the weather, or if he uses that idea in an attempt to level any criticism against global warming, or something else.
That's beside the point too.
I'm intrigued by the idea that God sent the snow and cold in order to tell us something. I don't know how to distinguish divine meteorological agency from, well, just weather. When are the clouds divine messengers? When does it rain God's judgement? I simply don't know.
But John Piper knows, doesn't he? At least, he claims he did in the example above. Obviously, John Piper doesn't read this blog, but maybe someone who knows him does. Or, more likely, someone who knows someone who knows someone. Can that someone ask pastor Piper whether the big freeze is God voicing his opinion about global warming? It would be nice to get that cleared up.
Photo stolen from Flickr. (And I know, the photo is from 2006, but still! It looks the same!)





