I Think I Believe I am Jesus' little brain cell

14Jul/104

The universe, as the Biblical authors saw it

James McGrath linked to this rather beautiful illustration of how the Biblical authors saw what we now call the universe by Michæl Paukner. Check out his other illustrations too.

Creationists say they read Genesis literally or naturally. On the face of it, that might sound true. But when you see an illustration like this, you see how much modern cosmology creationists import in to their readings. Reading literally and naturally is, in fact, a way of reading uncritically, of not properly thinking through what you're reading. Ironically, it also becomes a way of actually not reading Genesis literally, since the cosmology is simply ignored or missed.

The best thing to do is, of course, to actually reading Genesis literally - that is, not reading it as some sort of modern journalistic account of a scientific event, but according to its literary character. That is to say, as myth. That's allowing the text to be as and what it is and to allow it freely to address us. Because, while I'm sure they're not doing it intentionally, creationists, by insisting on reading Genesis as scientific and anti-evolutionary text, get so worked up that they miss the theological point entirely.

Or as Rowan Williams said,

My worry is creationism can end up reducing the doctrine of creation rather than enhancing it.

Click for a larger version.

6Jul/100

Dialectic

Click for larger versions.

Via The Daily What.

Tagged as: No Comments
18Oct/090

Semi-daily tidbits 18/10/2009

Crumb GenesisBiblical sex row over explicit illustrated Book of Genesis (Telegraph)
The book, which is released this month, carries the warning "adult supervision recommended for minors", and is described as "scandalous satire" by its publishers. It includes graphic illustrations of Bible characters having sexual intercourse, and other scenes depicting naked men and women as well as "gratuitous" depictions of violence.

Hell awaits for illegal file-sharers (Guardian)
In the war against albums being illegally uploaded on to the internet before they are released, David Tibet of the underground band Current 93 may have struck a minor, if resounding, victory. "This is a promotional CD," announces a little girl on the promo copy of Current 93's new album Aleph at Hallucinatory Mountain. "Anyone illegally selling, copying, uploading or downloading this material is condemned to eternal hellfire. Happy listening, God is love." Then Tibet – a devout Christian with strong views about the impending apocalypse – intones "murder" over a guitar riff heavy enough to terrify Satan. It makes you wonder whether a casual upload is really worth being cast into Hades for.
... "The announcement may have a certain dark humour, but it comes from my spiritual and religious convictions," says Tibet. "Ultimately, nothing is free; we pay for everything we do in one way or another. I'll be atoning for various sins at the Judgment Seat, but the illegal downloading of other people's music won't be one of them."

There are no easy answers in interfaith dialogue (Credo - Times Online)
One mistake that inexperienced interfaith dialoguers make is to try to identify the commonalities between various faiths. They might point to what appears to be similarities between Judaism and Islam in, say, the way in which prayer is conducted or fast days are observed.
I have experienced this first-hand because I used to do the same thing. It is attractive because it allows for the scoring of easy points without any serious intellectual or emotional investment. It is also painfully dishonest. To declare similarity between Judaism and Islam on the basis that their practitioners fast or pray is to betray an astonishing superficiality that does not do justice to either faith.
More importantly, the instinctive desire to find commonalities between faiths fundamentally undermines the whole point of interfaith dialogue in the first place, which is to learn how to respect those whose faith is profoundly different from your own.


Tom Honey on God and the tsunami (TED)

Physicists Calculate Number of Universes in the Multiverse (Technology Review)

The Social Psychology of the Origins Debate (An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution)

Quote of the day:

The physical body certainly exists, the organism exists, but organisms are not selves. I don't deny that there is a self-y feeling. I certainly feel like someone, but there is no such thing. There is neither a non-physical thing in a realm beyond the brain or the physical world that we could call a self, but there's also no thing in the brain that we must necessary call a self.

German philosopher of mind Thomas Metzinger, interviewed by ABC

10Sep/090

Worlds collide

Andrew Sullivan posted this beautiful image of a planetary nebula in the Scorpius constellation, some 3,800 light years away.

hs-2009-25-a-large_web

It reminded me of this.

eg-1610-13262

31Aug/090

The universe… Wow.

Photography-competition-G-007

All the stars individually visible in this image are in our own Milky Way, while the galaxy Centaurus-A in the centre is millions of light years beyond. Centaurus-A has merged with another, smaller galaxy and the debris from this collision forms the rusty brown band of dust across its middle
Photograph: Michael Sidonio/Royal Observatory Greenwich

More at the Guardian.

Tagged as: No Comments